New Poll: Majority of Likely Voters Oppose Obamacare's HHS Mandate

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 8, 2014
CONTACT: J.P. Duffy or Darin Miller, (866) FRC-NEWS or (866) 372-6397

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Family Research Council (FRC) released the results of a commissioned national survey showing that 53 percent of likely voters "oppose the mandate requiring the coverage of preventive care services for women which includes all FDA approved contraceptives, including drugs that can destroy a human embryo, and sterilization services without a direct cost to the patient."

The poll, conducted by WPA Opinion Research from May 1-4, sought to determine how likely voters view the HHS mandate. WPA noted that "There is broad opposition to the healthcare mandate that forces employers to cover contraceptives. Additionally, Democrats should be wary about being on the wrong side of this issue as voters that typically support them tend to oppose the mandate."

FRC President Tony Perkins made the following comments regarding the survey:

"As the debate over the HHS mandate has played out in the media and the courts, Americans oppose the mandate because it puts the jobs, livelihoods, and healthcare of Americans at risk. It forces those who stand up for their conscience to choose between paying crippling fines that could shut down their business or dropping the healthcare of all their employees.

"Respecting freedom of conscience is a long-held American tradition and the government should not impose mandates or laws that force individuals and businesses to violate these beliefs just to hold a job, own a business, or have health insurance. This is a flawed mandate within a flawed law.

"Americans should not be forced to violate their religious beliefs to purchase health insurance, hold a job, or operate a business in their country. Freedom of religion, the American people believe, extends to the freedom to practice your religion in your healthcare plan, as outlined by the First Amendment of the Constitution and illustrated in these poll results," concluded Perkins.

To view the results of the survey, click here: http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF14E15.pdf

-30-

More Content On Life And Human Dignity

Chemical Abortion and Abortifacients
State Policy Brief: Chemical Abortion Bans
Abortion Businesses
State Policy Brief: Cease Abortion Subsidies in Healthcare (CASH) Act
Fetal Dignity
State Policy Brief: Fetal Dignity Laws
Abortion Businesses
America's Direct Deposit to Planned Parenthood
Bioethics
Human-Animal Chimeras: Unethical and Unnecessary
Chemical Abortion and Abortifacients
Why Are Catholics Turning on the Little Sisters?
Human Trafficking
Pakistan religious discrimination is enabling human trafficking
Human Trafficking
FRC's Patrina Mosley Offers Testimony Against D.C.'s Effort to Fully Decriminalize the Sex Trafficking Industry
Abortion Businesses
Title X Rule Changes Protect the Unborn and Increase Health Care Options
Chemical Abortion and Abortifacients
One Year Later: The Impact of President Trump's Executive Order Protecting Religious Liberty
Abortion Businesses
FRC, SBA List Endorse Graham-Cassidy Legislation Repealing and Replacing Obamacare
Bioethics
Trump's Rule on the HHS Contraceptive Mandate Ensures Religious Freedom for All
Abortion Businesses
Pres. Trump Address Outlines Vision to Restore Freedom
Chemical Abortion and Abortifacients
TODAY: Arina Grossu to Testify Before Washington State Legislature in Support of Religious Freedom
Surgical Abortion
Family Research Council Praises House Passage of Conscience Protection Act
Pornography
California Sex Ed Gone Mad
Human Trafficking
How Do We Eradicate Sex Trafficking?
Pornography
Revenge pornography is a symptom of a deeper problem
Human Trafficking
Intersections of Evil
Surgical Abortion
Induced Abortion and Subsequent Preterm Birth

About Family Research Council

For over 35 years, we've been committed to advancing faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview.

Learn more