Syria's Tree of Liberty in Danger

Syria's Tree of Liberty in Danger

October 08, 2019

A virtual "tree of liberty" in the Middle East in Syria is in danger today, as the Trump administration prepares to pull out of a region at the border of Turkey and northeast Syria that is both friendly to U.S. interests and respectful of genuine religious freedom. As we have previously discussed, "It is an oft-overlooked story that in the wake of ISIS's genocide, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces established a semi-autonomous area in northeast Syria in which religious freedom flourished and religious minorities were protected. Pluralism thrived and democracy began to gain a foothold." And in that oasis of freedom, Christians and other people of faith found refuge, but now they face possible annihilation as U.S. forces prepare to leave, and Turkey plans to invade.

This announced withdrawal of the U.S. forces in the area has drawn wide-spread opposition and concern. Politico reports that Senate GOP leaders are urging the president to reconsider, noting "(i)n February, 70 senators supported a nonbinding amendment backing U.S. operations in both Syria and Afghanistan."

On Monday's Washington Watch I spoke with Chris Mitchell, Middle East bureau chief for CBN News in Jerusalem, who reported that Kurds in that region, who have protected Christians, "are feeling terrified that they're going to be the victims, especially of these jihadist groups that are allied with the Turkish army. I've been hearing that they're amassing on the borders even right now."

When Turkey was last in the region in March of 2018, the Turkish army and their allies "burned churches, they killed Christians, they hunted down Christians. And they ethnically cleansed that city of Kurds, hundreds of thousands of Kurds," noted Mitchell.

Faced with such a threat, the regional government may be forced to make a dangerous alliance. Mitchell noted that the relatively free region may feel forced to make an alliance with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad rather than face the wrath of Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is known to hate the Kurds. But the alliance with Assad would most likely bring Russian and Iranian forces into Northeast Syria.

"(G)eopolitically, it could be a catastrophe if Turkey comes in and this whole area may be given back to the Assad regime," Mitchell reported.

Lieutenant General Jerry Boykin, who also joined Washington Watch yesterday, agreed with Mitchell's assessment and added that such a change also puts another key ally in the region at risk -- Israel.

Those moving into the region with Turkey want to "destroy Israel, to wipe Israel off the map," Boykin said. And if they can take that area "that's the land bridge" Iran needs to reach to the Mediterranean Sea and ultimately Israel.

"This is a bad situation emerging here, and what I am really afraid of is that you're going to see such a shift in the balance of power in that whole part of the world as a result of this, because you bring Russia, Iran and the government of Bashar al-Assad together there and the country of Syria. And what does that portend for the future? It portends a huge threat to Israel, but it is also potentially a huge threat to the rest of the Middle East," the general observed.

Also joining me on the radio show, Travis Weber, FRC's Director of the Center for Religious Liberty and Vice President of Policy, explained why this Middle East conflict affects Americans here at home. "The reason we're interested in it is the same reason we ultimately care about religious freedom here at home," he said. "We want to advocate for the right of every person to out their faith free, without fear of repercussion, by the government, (or) by social forces in society."

The people in the Middle East, facing Turkey's military might are "not asking for us to do this for them," to fight their battle or win their war, said Weber, "They're just saying, can you support us? And I'm looking at them thinking these are natural allies for the United States."

Please join us in praying for President Trump to make the right decisions, and for the Christians and others in the region.

Tony Perkins's Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.

HHS Secretary Azar Confirmed for VVS

October 08, 2019

The crowd at this weekend's Values Voter Summit will be witnessing history Friday at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in D.C. For the first time in 14 years, VVS will be welcoming a sitting HHS Secretary, Alex Azar. With three years of pro-life and pro-freedom accomplishments under his belt, Secretary Azar will have plenty to talk about as head of one of the most important government agencies in the country. From Title X regulations to protecting conscience rights, and everything in between, Azar's HHS has done more to advance a culture of life than anyone's.

Don't miss a second of the action – including the rest of this incredible two-day line-up featuring Ambassador Sam Brownback, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), USAID Administrator Mark Green, Eric Metaxas, Dr. Dennis Prager, Allie Stuckey, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, Dana Loesch, James O'Keefe, Todd Starnes, Lt. Col. (Ret.) Oliver North, Brigitte Gabriel, abortion survivor Melissa Ohden, and more. Join FRC for Saturday night's Faith, Family, and Freedom Gala Dinner in honor of Pastor Andrew Brunson, best-selling author book signings, a special screening of Dennis Prager's No Safe Spaces: You Have the Right to Remain Silent, targeted breakout sessions, exhibit hall, and more! For a complete list of the confirmed speakers and events, visit

Supreme Court Hears Cases About Redefining "Sex"

October 08, 2019

Today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in three cases which could either advance the aims of the LGBT movement or preserve the rule of law. At issue is the meaning of discrimination on the basis of "sex" in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The most common-sense understanding would be that "sex" means one's biological sex at birth, and "sex discrimination" means favoring men over women or women over men. However, LGBT activists are trying to persuade the Supreme Court that "discrimination" based on "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" are also forms of "sex discrimination."

FRC's Sarah Perry and Meg Kilgannon (the latter speaking on behalf of the "Hands Across the Aisle" Coalition that has been opposing transgender policies in the Fairfax County, Virginia public schools) both addressed a rally outside the court that was organized by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). ADF is representing a Michigan funeral home that declined to permit a biologically male employee to come to work dressed as a female. I also attended today's rally, which highlighted the coalition that has formed across ideological lines to defend women's safety and privacy, especially in private spaces such as showers, locker rooms, and domestic violence shelters. The coalition unites pro-family groups like FRC and Concerned Women for America with feminist groups like WOLF, the Women's Liberation Front.

Sarah Perry noted research showing a surprising overlap between diagnoses of autism and diagnoses of gender dysphoria, and argued that many young people struggling with autism are being mis-diagnosed as transgender. Meg Kilgannon, who was speaking when the parties came out of the court at the end of oral arguments, bluntly called out the "lies" of the transgender movement and urged listeners to stand up for the truth.

The rally in front of the iconic Supreme Court building had been delayed because the area was cleared for security reasons when a suspicious package was found. When demonstrators from both sides were permitted to return to the sidewalk in front of the court, those supporting the LGBT plaintiffs in the cases chanted, "This is what democracy looks like." The chant was ironic at best, given that (as with the redefinition of marriage) they were seeking from the Supreme Court a victory they have been unable to win through the democratic process. (Hecklers also did everything they could to drown out the rally in support of biological women, instead of permitting the open debate that should represent "what democracy looks like.") Legislatures can pass laws against "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" discrimination if they choose (although FRC believes such laws are unwise); but the fact that Congress and thirty states have declined to enact such legislation is no reason for the Supreme Court to do it for them.

Previous Washington Update Articles »