Biden's Lack of Shelf-Respect

Biden's Lack of Shelf-Respect

January 11, 2022

From filet mignon to rapid tests. If you ask local grocers, that's the story of 2022 -- empty shelves, frustrated customers, record-high sick days, and a host of other problems they pin directly on the government. Two weeks ago, the best-selling item at New England's Stew Leonard's supermarket was steak. Now, the owner says, his truckers are in loading-dock bidding wars over COVID tests. Welcome to the alternate universe of the Biden administration, where we've beaten the virus, the CDC is above politics, and our supply chain crises never happened.

For the White House, who's desperately clung to its "nothing-to-see-here" narrative on the virus, inflation, worker shortages, court losses, and consumer panic, the doses of reality have been painful. Six months after declaring America's "independence from the virus," Joe Biden has never been more affected by its surge. His so-called "pandemic of the unvaccinated" has become a "pandemic of vaccinated or not" -- becoming just another narrative that's fallen apart, along with what was left of the president's credibility.

Making matters worse for #BareShelvesBiden, Americans who don't have Omicron are still incredibly inconvenienced by it. There are food shortages, staff shortages, test shortages -- and, most worrisome for Democrats, trust shortages. All of this, people point out, when the country had supposedly put the virus behind us. On the contrary, executives warn. During a call with food industry representatives on Monday, Geoff Freeman, CEO of Consumer Brands Association, stunned everyone when he announced that "more employee absences were reported in the past two weeks than in all of 2020." "Throw on top of that being down 80,000 truck drivers nationally and another 10 percent of workers being absent at food manufacturing facilities," he shook his head, "and you're putting a lot of pressure on the system all at one time."

And what is the administration's response? Fire the unvaccinated workers we have. This week, the president's mandates, which went into effect Monday, are putting stressed-out employers in an even more precarious position. While the U.S. Supreme Court heard emergency appeals to the OSHA rules last week, businesses and other agencies are still in limbo about how to carry out the president's order. Some leaders like Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds (R) and Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson (R) have taken a wait-and-see approach. Instead of pulling the trigger on Biden's vaccine order, they're urging employers to ignore it. "We are going to continue to protect the freedoms and liberties of Iowans," Reynolds said after telling her state's labor commission to submit notice that it wouldn't comply.

To doctors like Rep. Greg Murphy (R-N.C.), the simple fact that Biden moved ahead with these mandates is mind-boggling. "It's unconstitutional... and the crazy thing is, they knew this beforehand." Biden even admitted it, Murphy pointed out. "He said, it's probably not constitutional, but we're going to go ahead and do it anyway. And so that's the difference between this administration and other conservative administrations. We actually look at the law first and then see what we can do afterwards. They just do what they can and then hope it's lawful -- and oftentimes it's not. So I think they both get thrown out."

Until then, Murphy argues, the administration needs to come to grips with the fact that its COVID strategy has spectacularly backfired. Even if they did stand up in court, Biden's mandates have had incredibly diminished returns -- since, as the good doctor insisted on "Washington Watch," "We're not going to vaccinate ourselves out of this problem." The virus isn't going away, he argued, and regardless, this isn't how you get more people vaccinated. "You don't shame them. You don't bully them. Look at Japan, for example. They have 78 percent of their people vaccinated, and they did [it] through education. They didn't do it through mandates... And that's how we affect change -- not by trying to make people second-class citizens because of a medical decision they make."

At this point, unfortunately, no one has any faith that the CDC could educate if they wanted to. The agency at the top of the COVID food chain is a punchline, even by CNN's standards. Director Rochelle Walensky has become a walking meme factory, as high-level contradictions pile up faster than new cases. "Seriously, at this point, you're better off waiting a month to hear what the groundhog has to say," the Tonight Show's Jimmy Fallon joked. "Bad predictions, bad information, and a habit of stomping all over the truth are a big part of the reason why so many Americans are feeling not just depressed but actually angry about what's going on with the virus," Kyle Smith vents in a column detailing a "graveyard of false COVID claims."

Murphy agrees. From mask-wearing to quarantine times, "We've seen so many flip-flops from the CDC, the FDA, the Biden administration, and Lord [Anthony] Fauci that it really has undercut people's confidence in doctors and in vaccines... The problem is, people haven't been honest about this. You know, Biden said he's going to come in and he's not going to crush jobs -- he's going to crush the virus, which was just a flat-out lie... And the problem is, Fauci's turned political, Walensky turned political... and that's what has destroyed Americans' confidence in these very august institutions."

Meanwhile, as Americans wait for the president to admit that "these problems are real problems," several have moved on to the real headache: the economy. Only 37 percent say the virus is their top issue right now, a 16-point drop from this time last year. Instead, COVID has been replaced by inflation, shortages, prices, and other priorities the Biden administration should be addressing instead of wasting its time stumping for a federal election takeover. "The White House's response to anything is puzzling to me," Murphy agreed. "I think they're tone deaf in so many issues affecting our country. Yes, COVID is here -- and it's still going to be here... But what people are seeing with inflation [and gas prices] and groceries, these are the granular things that bother everybody, every day. It's in their face while COVID may not be. And I think people's patience is [wearing thin]."

Tony Perkins's Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.

Is Religious Freedom Even on the Military's Radar?

January 11, 2022

The Defense Department didn't have any trouble getting 97 percent of its troops vaccinated -- but when it comes to granting some exemptions, well, they're just too busy. On Monday, the same day the Pentagon upped its alarm level on the virus to HPCON Charlie (Health Protection Condition Charlie), Pentagon spokesman John Kirby struggled to answer the looming questions -- from why the vaccinated troops were getting COVID to where the religious accommodations were. As usual, none of the department's answers did much to reassure anyone.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin "continues to believe strongly... that the vaccines really do work," Kirby insisted. "And it really is, when it comes down to it, it's a readiness issue," he tried to explain. But if readiness really mattered, why is the military so intent on discharging thousands of troops with faith-based objections? Instead of depleting the force, why not grant the opt-outs that so many service members requested?

Kirby didn't really have an answer, instead replying that the process is "controlled by each of the military departments: the Army, the Department of the Navy and Department of the Air Force, Space Force. They are in charge of adjudicating those exemption requests and making those decisions. But in terms of your broader question, which is I think... does DOD still believe in the value of a religious exemption process for this or any other vaccine? The answer is yes, we do," he continued.

That's news to people like First Liberty Institute's Mike Berry, who's gone to court on behalf of 35 Navy SEALs who were threatened with losing their tridents just for applying for a religious exemption. And yet, the DOD still wants people to think that the military values their conscientious objections. "We believe that there should be a channel vehicle through which men and women of the workforce who believe they have legitimate religious exemptions to seek on their behalf. That they have a process to make that request and to have that request treated seriously... I understand the numbers are zero right now in terms of COVID [accommodations]," he went on, "but even the services will tell you they still have a backlog of -- in some cases -- thousands of additional religious exemption requests to work through. So, this is an ongoing process, yes."

This is a Defense Department that managed to get millions of troops vaccinated in a matter of months, but when it comes to processing some paperwork, it's simply too overwhelming. Berry doesn't buy it. When we asked him what he thought of Kirby's excuse, he didn't pull any punches.

"Despite what the Pentagon says, we all know this is a sham process with a pre-determined outcome. The DOD has approved zero religious accommodations for the vaccine mandate, yet it has approved hundreds, maybe even thousands, of medical and administrative exemptions. If a virus with over 99 percent survivability is really that deadly, and the vaccine with hundreds of thousands of breakthrough cases is really that effective, then DOD would not allow any exemptions for any reason. But we now know the vaccine is not very effective and the DOD's entire exemption scheme is a charade. It's nothing more than religious discrimination and a political agenda."

For our military's sake -- and America's sake -- let's hope the courts agree.

Tony Perkins's Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.

Biden Rattles Saber at Bear Threats of War

January 11, 2022

World diplomats meet this week to discuss what may be Europe's tensest security crisis in 30 years. Vladimir Putin has amassed an estimated 175,000 troops near the Ukrainian border, poised to invade the country if Western powers fail to appease the Russian Bear. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has responded that America will meet a Russian invasion with "massive consequences," including "economic, financial, and other consequences." But the secretary's broadside completely missed the elephant in the room: behind threats of economic sanctions, is the U.S. loaded for Bear? Will the U.S. and our NATO allies commit military resources to defend Ukraine's sovereignty against a Russian invasion?

Ukraine's 44 million people, including many ethnic Russians, is extremely pro-West and are "united in their opposition to the Russians," explained Heritage Foundation Vice President James Carafano. They "will fight really hard, and it will be very, very bloody." But Russia's overwhelming air power and manpower could turn the conflict into a lopsided massacre unless Ukraine receives Western military aid -- and fast. The result could be "millions of Ukrainians forced out of their own country, which will create a massive refugee flood into Western Europe," Carafano warned.

Ironically, Ukraine has little say over its fate. In the "three sets of meetings this week," American and Russian personnel dialogued directly (but got nowhere), the NATO-Russia Council will convene, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) will meet. Ukraine is only represented in the OSCE (along with 56 other nations). That's because, for most of the world, "this is not about Ukraine," explained Carafano. "This is about Putin wanting to expand his sphere of influence, destabilize NATO, and drive the United States out of the transatlantic community."

Russia frequently bullies its smaller neighbors through "energy blackmail," as Carafano termed it, by withholding energy shipments until they acquiesce with the Great Northern Bear's political diktats. President Trump challenged Russia's stranglehold on Europe's energy supply by exporting American natural gas to Europe, but President Biden quickly killed that bright idea. Even America's Western European allies rely on Russia's energy exports, particularly in winter months (even Italy has said it cannot afford to sanction Russian energy in winter). The only obstacle to Russia's hardball energy diplomacy has been Ukraine, through which the pipelines to Western Europe run. But the Biden administration helped smooth Russia's way to complete another pipeline, the Nord Stream 2, which would completely bypass Ukraine.

So far, the Biden administration is playing right into Putin's already potent hand. Grand and manifestly vacuous rhetorical flourishes undermine America's security guarantees all over the world -- Putin's ultimate goal. Biden's team has "literally put nothing on the table so far that the Russians really worry about," Carafano complained. Threatened sanctions haven't stopped Russia before, and Russia responded to Biden's threat of sanctions with a threat of their own. And the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal convinced the Russians that Biden was no one to worry about.

The question remains, will America roll over and allow Russia to annex Ukraine without a fight? In Europe of the 1930s, the Nazi spider swallowed whole nations -- Austria (1938), Czechoslovakia (1939), and Poland (1939) -- because more powerful nations would not rouse themselves. Like the Fuhrer, Vladimir Putin claims foreign lands on the pretense of ethnicity similarities, regularly avows his next conquest will satisfy him, and piles troops on the borders of weaker neighbors. Let us pray that, somehow, the world will avoid another, catastrophic parallel to 80 years ago: namely, the leader of the free world triumphantly returning home too soon to proclaim an empty agreement has secured "peace in our time."