To understand Planned Parenthood Federation of America's (PPFA) public statements concerning the videos released this past summer showing its coarse and predatory sale of the body parts of unborn children, reflection on two passages from a couple of great books is worthwhile:
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master — that's all."
Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
"The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of (the state), but to make all other modes of thought impossible. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meaning and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods."
George Orwell, 1984
Language shapes thought. It defines the content of our thinking such that we revert, by mental default, to using words we are used to hearing regarding various subject matter.
An example: When I think of the Grand Canyon, I think of the amazing canyon in Arizona whose depth, variety, and sheer size are both beautiful and remarkable. However, had I been conditioned to think of this geographical wonder as dangerous and hideous, my mental conception would be starkly different.
Words are used to depict or describe; when they are used dishonestly -- when they distort one's understanding of a person or event or idea -- they are weapons against intellectual integrity and morality itself.
Planned Parenthood has developed a lectionary, accepted pro forma by the secular Left, to describe its various activities. Not unique to PPFA -- this same set of words and phrases is used by the popular media and liberal politicians, as well -- nonetheless the brazenness of the organization in using its specialized and euphemized vocabulary has elevated verbal and intellectual misrepresentation to a new level of hypocrisy.
This lectionary is articulated in an announcement made today by PPFA President Cecile Richards. In a letter for National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins, Richards said "the organization's affiliates will no longer accept any reimbursements for costs associated with procuring tissue from abortions."
Consider just one of the terms used in the letter: "fetal tissue." When one thinks of tissue, usually it is of the flesh around our bones. Tissue samples are removed and studied; innocuous and common, right?
PPFA is not referring to a "donation" of such "tissue." It's speaking of the scavenging of organs of unborn children aborted late in their pregnancies. Dr. Deborah Necotola, Senior Director of Medical Services for the PPFA, explains what her organization really means by "tissue:"
You try to intentionally go above and below the thorax, so that, you know, we've been very good at getting heart, lung, liver … so I'm not gonna crush that part, I'm going to basically crush below, I'm gonna crush above, and I'm gonna see if I can get it all intact ... I'll actually collect what you want sometimes, and put it aside ... Why not? I'm right there. Oh, for sure, I mean to me, I don't know, it makes the procedure that much better."
Then there's the term "reimbursement." PPFA's decision to end its "reimbursement" scheme amounts to the employment of another euphemism, at best; the videos released by the Center for Medical Progress imply that PPFA has a high profit motive for its organs-for-sale business.
The reality is that there is no cost to PPFA in providing infant cadavers to tissue procurement organizations (TPOs). As David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress wrote to congressional leaders in August,
We now know from Cecile Richards' letter that $60 per collected tissue specimen is what will "get a toe in" to harvest baby parts at Planned Parenthood Pacific Southwest. Like other TPOs, (Advanced Bioscience Resources) handles all dissection, packaging, and shipping of fetal organs and tissues, and so it is unclear for what PPPS could be receiving "reimbursement." This is especially suspicious given that Ms. Richards says the $60 fee is paid "per tissue specimen." Thus, if ABR harvests a liver and a thymus, a common fetal tissue order, from an 18-week fetus aborted at the San Diego clinic, Planned Parenthood receives a total payment of $120 from that case. It stretches credulity to believe that ABR's technician harvesting two organs from a fetus costs Planned Parenthood $120 -- this is a new revenue stream off of fetal tissue with no real cost to Planned Parenthood, and thus a criminal profit.
In sum, as Notre Dame Law School professor O. Carter Snead told the Associated Press today, "Planned Parenthood's decision is clearly an effort at damage control -- to preserve its carefully cultivated (and ferociously defended) image as merely a women's health care organization. Nothing Planned Parenthood has done today will change its role as the world's leading abortion provider."
Indeed. In the words of Tennessee Republican Congresswoman Diane Black, quoted in the same AP story as Snead, "It is curious that, while Planned Parenthood officials maintain there has been no wrongdoing, they still find it necessary to change their policy following the recent undercover videos. Clearly, this was a decision motivated by optics rather than the organization's conscience."
And as Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) said, "It is clear that Planned Parenthood knows it is wrong to profit from the sale of baby body parts, but their decision to stop selling organs doesn't change the fact that Planned Parenthood still profits from the death of children. This organization still engages in the inhumane treatment of children, and our federal government forces taxpayers to give them their hard-earned money. Congress must continue all investigations into their grotesque practices and remain committed to defunding them."
At this stage, even Big Brother would walk away from trying to market Planned Parenthood. Will Congress? Will the White House? Let us pray to that end.